THERE’S A MOMENT in Chewin’ the Fat when the Big Man fixes someone with a stare that says more than a thousand policy papers ever could. Arms folded. Slight lean forward. The look that tells you the conversation’s finished — you’re just catching up.
That’s the look you imagine him giving the NHS when dermatology comes up. Because nothing exposes the absurdities of modern healthcare quite like skin.
Skin is visible, it’s common, and it’s often urgent. And yet in Scotland, if you develop a rash, a lesion, or a worrying change, you don’t enter medicine so much as a bureaucratic holding pattern. Referrals are written. Letters are triaged. Appointments are rationed. Somewhere behind clinic doors that rarely seem to open, dermatology quietly goes on holiday. Doctors often refer to it as Dermaholiday.
In parts of the country – Grampian being the most notorious – routine dermatology waits have stretched to nearly three years. Three years to see someone about a disease you wear on your face, your hands, your genitals. Three years for conditions that itch, bleed, infect, scar and spread. Official targets say twelve weeks. Reality says 144 – and climbing.
Delay changes disease
These waits are often described as unfortunate, as if delay were a neutral inconvenience. It isn’t. Delay changes disease. Psoriasis progresses from skin to systemic inflammation. Eczema becomes infected and drives antibiotic use. Acne scars permanently. Chronic itch wrecks sleep, mood and work. By the time a patient finally reaches clinic, the problem is no longer what it was when they first asked for help. Delay isn’t passive — it’s iatrogenic.
If that’s uncomfortable, skin cancer should be alarming. Scotland hasn’t met its own 62-day cancer treatment standard nationally for over a decade. While averages hover around the line, some patients wait months – even hundreds of days – from urgent referral to treatment. For melanoma, that’s not a statistic — it’s a prognosis. Breslow thickness increases with time. Anxiety becomes part of the disease, and survival falls.
Unlike England, Scotland doesn’t operate a mandated two-week wait for suspected skin cancer. GPs are expected to refer promptly, but once the referral is made, urgency dissolves into regional variation and hopeful language about being seen “as quickly as possible”. Hope is not a pathway.
We’re often told digital dermatology will save us. And to be fair, when used properly, it helps. High-quality images reviewed rapidly by specialists can slash waiting lists. But bolting digital triage onto a structurally slow system just means patients reach the waiting room faster. It’s starting the right process in the wrong place.
The real problem is older and deeper. Dermatology in the NHS is treated like a rarefied hospital specialty when it is, in reality, frontline medicine. Skin doesn’t wait politely. It itches, bleeds, spreads, infects and frightens. The longer first contact is delayed, the worse outcomes become – clinically, psychologically and economically.
We’ve built a system where overwhelmed GPs act as gatekeepers, hospital clinics are designed for complexity rather than volume, and rationing happens by delay. Not because clinicians don’t care, but because the system was never designed for speed.
So let’s say the heresy plainly: dermatology should be primary-access.
Not eventually or after a filter, but from the outset – as standard.
Dentistry figured this out decades ago. You don’t need a GP letter to see a dentist. Optometry works the same way. Sexual health, when done properly, understands that stigma and delay are solved by access, not supervision. Skin, absurdly, was left behind.
The Big Man squints.
“So let me get this straight,” he says. “We trust folk wi’ drills in yer jaw, but no’ wi’ cream on yer skin?”
Exactly.
The answer isn’t abolishing hospital dermatology: it’s rescuing it. Consultants should be dealing with rare disease, systemic illness, severe autoimmune pathology and inpatient work – not drowning in first presentations that never needed to reach them in the first place. That requires a proper front door.
Lives aren’t saved in a filing cabinet
That front door has a name: FASTT – First Attender Skin Triage and Therapy.
FASTT isn’t a rebrand or a pilot with a logo. It’s a reset. You book; you turn up; you’re seen; you’re treated; you leave. No letters. No performative delay. Lives aren’t saved in a filing cabinet.
FASTT clinics would sit in or alongside A&E, visible and unapologetic, with one hard rule: skin only. Simple cases are treated immediately, complex ones escalate, non-skin problems go elsewhere. No scope creep. No empire building. When work is quiet, FASTT clinicians keep flow moving — suturing minors, dressing wounds — because this is about throughput, not professional ornamentation.
Technology finally gets used properly. No more farcical phone calls asking patients to describe a rash. Instead we have high-resolution images, structured histories and AI decision support that flags timelines and red flags instantly. AI doesn’t replace clinicians — it stops them being slowed down by the obvious.
“If folk can upload a picture o’ their dinner,” the Big Man mutters, “they can upload a picture o’ their eczema.”
And then there’s the bit everyone avoids: genital skin. In FASTT, it isn’t awkward, siloed or delayed. It’s integrated, first-presentation care — European-style venerology done properly. This produces earlier diagnosis, fewer inappropriate antibiotics, reduced onward transmission and less anxiety-driven reattendance. Chronic management stays where it belongs. But the damage done by waiting stops.
At this point, objections appear. Hospital dermatologists worry about status. GPs worry about continuity. Managers worry about risk. Politicians worry about headlines.
But listen carefully and you’ll hear what’s missing: evidence that delay is safer than speed.
The Big Man has heard enough.
“Yer telling me,” he says slowly, “that weeks o’ waiting, bouncing between services, and getting worse — that’s safer than seeing the right person the same day?”
Silence falls.
FASTT doesn’t threaten safety; it threatens comfort. It exposes how much of what we call caution is really habit, and how much governance is fear in a suit.
Patients don’t care about specialty boundaries. They care about being seen, about being believed and about treatment that happens now. Once you give people same-day dermatology, you can’t take it back. Once skin stops being a waiting-list sport, excellence becomes normal.
The Big Man gives his verdict.
“Skin does nae wait. Disease does nae wait. So stop pretending delay is a virtue.”
FASTT is same-day care, by people trained to do exactly that.
Not revolutionary because it’s clever but because it’s obvious and obvious ideas are always the ones the system resists hardest.




Comments: 0
Join the debate
Do you agree with this analysis, or is the author wrong? Have your say below.
No comments yet. Be the first to join the discussion.